Wait for it......at the exact perfect moment, the insurrection act 2.0 will be enacted. And down they will go. It always has to get worse before it gets better!
FOR ALL FEDERAL AND STATE OATH TAKERS AND OATH BREAKERS...
FEDERAL ON BREAKING AN OATH OF OFFICE..
IMMEDIATE REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
IMMEDIATE SUSPRNSION OF SECURITY CLEARANCE(S)
IMMEDIATE CEASE OF PAY
IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF ALL CREDENTIALS, AUTHORITY, RANK, PRIVLEDGES
CRIMINAL RESTRAINT
RENUMERARTION TO HARMED PARTIES INCLUDING WE THE PEOPLE...
PER:
Specific statutes like 18 U.S.C. ยง 1918 outline penalties for violations, while actions like advocating the overthrow of the government are criminal offenses under 5 U.S.C. ยง 7311.
Applicable Federal Laws
5 U.S.C. ยง 7311: This statute makes it a criminal offense for federal employees, including members of Congress, to advocate for the overthrow or alteration of the U.S. government by unconstitutional means.
18 U.S.C. ยง 1918: This law provides the federal penalties for violating the oath of office, including removal from office, confinement, or fines.
Consequences for Federal Officials
Impeachment (for the President): The President, or other civil officers, can be impeached by the House of Representatives for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, which include violations of their oath.
Removal from Office: A conviction following an impeachment trial in the Senate can result in the removal of the official from their position.
Criminal Charges: In addition to impeachment, officials who violate their oath may face criminal prosecution for acts such as bribery, fraud, or abuse of power.
Fines and Imprisonment: Violations of certain statutes, such as the one prohibiting advocating for the overthrow of the government, can lead to confinement or fines under 18 U.S.C. ยง 1918.
Examples of Violations
A breach of the presidential oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" is a serious offense.
Inciting a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol, as alleged against former President Trump, was argued to be a direct violation of his duty to defend the Constitution, leading to impeachment proceedings.
Alien and Sedition Acts (1798). Also moves said violations and criminal charges/sentencing into the military courts purview.
Four funders supporting the right to protest in Minnesota: Proteus Fund ยท Solidaire Network ยท Tides Foundation ยท Open Society Foundations.National Bail Funds & Networks
The Bail Project: Provides free bail assistance nationwide.
National Bail Out: Focuses on freeing Black mothers and caregivers during key moments.
National Bail Fund Network (NBFN) (via Community Justice Exchange): A directory of over 80 local funds for pretrial detention and immigration cases, notes Community Justice Exchange and InfluenceWatch.
LGBTQ Freedom Fund: Assists LGBTQ individuals in detention.
Examples of Local & State Funds (from NBFN directory)
California: Bay Area Anti-Repression Committee Bail Fund.
Illinois: Chicago Community Bond Fund.
Kentucky: Louisville Community Bail Fund.
Michigan: Michigan Solidarity Bail Fund.
Minnesota: Minnesota Freedom Fund.
New York: Brooklyn Community Bail Fund, Envision Freedom Fund.Based on job data, potential salaries or hourly wages for related work in Missouri include:
Product Demonstrators earn an average of $14.50 to $17.05 per hour, depending on the city.
Petition Circulators have reported earnings of $75 - $100 an hour or can make a daily rate of $150-$450.
Political Canvassers and Field Organizers average around $18 - $22 per hour.
Full-time "Protest" jobs listed on job boards (often related to event promotion or advocacy) have a reported salary range between $30,000 and $79,000 annually, with specific roles like Political Associate at $55,000 - $68,000 a year.
A Civil Rights Activist position can range from $67,500 to $98,500 annually.
Overall wages for jobs categorized as "Protest Jobs" in Missouri have a median hourly wage of approximately $17.75 per hour.
Indirect support via groups like Future Forward USA (which backed Democrats) estimated at $50-100 million per cycle.153243a1350d
Bill Gates/Gates Foundation: The foundation has given small amounts to Democratic state parties (e.g., $15,412 to Wisconsin Democrats), but aggregates show about $42,611 to 39 House Democrats and $35,872 to 16 Senate Democrats total in recent cyclesโno individual names specified. Gates personally donated $50 million to Future Forward (supporting Kamala Harris and Democrats) in 2024. Direct to congressional members: Minimal, under $100k combined.cc292ae6802b
Clinton Foundation: Limited political giving; totals around $25,000 in 2024 cycle, mostly to DNC or candidates like Kamala Harrisโnot to House/Senate members directly. No specific congressional recipients found.
Rothschild Family: Minimal involvement; only one direct donation identified: Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) received $5,800 in 2022 from individuals affiliated with Rothschild North America.b376b6
Donations from Corporations, Tech Oligarchs (e.g., Google, Facebook/Meta, Amazon Executives), and Shell Companies
Tech industry contributions (from companies, PACs, and employees) heavily favor Democrats. These are often from executives or employee bundles. Here's a list of top Democratic recipients in the 2024 cycle from the "Internet" industry (including Google, Meta, Amazon):
House Democrats:
Ro Khanna (D-CA): $331,023
Colin Allred (D-TX): $299,004
Elissa Slotkin (D-MI): $290,416
Ruben Gallego (D-AZ): $259,766
Andy Kim (D-NJ): $163,614
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA): $123,725
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA): $122,455
Josh Harder (D-CA): $119,327
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): $117,207
Katie Porter (D-CA): $116,88578f0f6
Senate Democrats:
Jon Tester (D-MT): $425,561
Sherrod Brown (D-OH): $328,539
Bob Casey (D-PA): $271,887
Jacky Rosen (D-NV): $267,114
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI): $215,834
Maria Cantwell (D-WA): $180,352
Tim Kaine (D-VA): $117,411
Martin Heinrich (D-NM): $105,061
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY): $74,425
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN): $51,366fd4bbd
For shell companies/dark money: These are undisclosed by definition, but groups like Sixteen Thirty Fund and Arabella Advisors (linked to Wyss/Soros) have pumped $1.9 billion into 2024 races, often supporting Democrats via super PACs. Specific shell entities aren't named in records, but examples include funds routing foreign-linked money (e.g., criticized in congressional reports). No direct ties to individual members, but indirect support to competitive Democratic races estimated at hundreds of millions.3b756b60cff3
All estimates are from public FEC/OpenSecrets data and represent "real money" (reported contributions). Indirect/dark money makes full tracking challenging.
ActBlue is a nonprofit fundraising platform that processes small-dollar donations primarily for Democratic candidates and causes. Virtually all Democratic House and Senate members receive funds through ActBlue, as it's the main conduit for grassroots contributions to Democrats. These are not direct donations from ActBlue itself but aggregated from individual donors. Based on fundraising data, here are some of the top Democratic congressional fundraisers via ActBlue in recent cycles (e.g., 2024), with estimated totals raised through the platform:
Adam Schiff (D-CA, House/Senate candidate): Over $100 million in total fundraising, much via ActBlue.
Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY, House): Around $20-30 million.
Jon Tester (D-MT, Senate): Approximately $50-60 million.
Sherrod Brown (D-OH, Senate): Around $40-50 million.
Ruben Gallego (D-AZ, House/Senate candidate): About $30-40 million.
These estimates are based on overall campaign hauls where ActBlue handles the majority of online donations. ActBlue doesn't "donate" directly; it facilitates.
Donations from Foundations and NGOs (Soros, Wyss, Gates, Clinton, Rothschild)
Public records from sources like OpenSecrets show that these entities often contribute to PACs, party committees, or advocacy groups rather than directly to individual candidates. Direct donations to House/Senate members are limited by federal laws (e.g., $3,300 per individual per election). Here's what reliable data indicates:
George Soros/Open Society Foundations: Soros has contributed over $170 million to Democratic causes in recent cycles, mostly through PACs like Democracy PAC, which support Democratic candidates indirectly. No direct individual House/Senate recipient lists were found in aggregates, but he backed groups aiding Democrats like Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) via super PACs. Estimated indirect support to Democratic congressional races: Tens of millions per cycle.051c68
Hansjรถrg Wyss/Berger Action Fund: Wyss, through the Berger Action Fund and affiliates like Sixteen Thirty Fund, has funneled over $63 million to liberal groups in recent years. These funds go to dark money networks supporting Democratic priorities, but no direct donations to specific House/Senate members were identified.
Pocahontas Warren has hidden her money out of yet another NGO. Compliments of the Autopen. This NGO is closingโฆnobody noticed a few more billion โdisappearedโ.This story was originally reported by Jennifer Gerson of The 19th. Meet Jennifer and read more of their reporting on gender, politics and policy.
Supermajority, the nonprofit organization focused on mobilizing women voters, is shutting down.
Founded in 2019 by Cecile Richards, the former president of Planned Parenthood; Ai-jen Poo, co-founder and executive director of the National Domestic Workers Alliance; and #BlackLivesMatter co-creator Alicia Garza, Supermajority became a key player in the womenโs resistance movement.
Since its founding, Supermajority has contacted more than 20 million women voters, organizing for candidates including Democratic Govs. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Katie Hobbs of Arizona and Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, as well as for then-Vice President Kamala Harrisโ unsuccessful presidential bid last year. The group plans to connect its volunteers with other organizations that do grassroots organizing work, starting with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). All 22 current Supermajority employees will be laid off; the organization will be winding down its work in the next several weeks.
Executive director Taylor Salditch said the shuttering of Supermajority reflects how politics and organizing have changed since 2019, becoming more community-focused, with people looking for ways to make a tangible impact beyond protesting. She also said that for many Americans, especially on the left, gender has faded as a focus.
โI think when you have an administration that is so openly violent toward women, it makes all the sense in the world that women are not claiming that identity and running at it when itโs dangerous to do that,โ Salditch said.
Jess Morales Rocketto, another one of Supermajorityโs co-founders, said the groupโs founding was prompted by young women seeking a home for their desire to meet others and take action. Helping them organize is the groupโs legacy, she said.
โThere are organizations that exist now that didnโt exist when we started and there are leaders that exist now that didnโt exist when we started, and we trained some of them. Thatโs the legacy that we leave behind, and certainly a legacy that Cecile stood for, which feels very present to me in this as well,โ Morales Rocketto said. โAs organizers like to say, you want to organize yourself out of a job. I donโt think that we solved every problem for women, but I think that we have left something that can continue to build and grow that work.โ
She also recognizes how much the current cultural climate has changed โ and the impact that culture has on politics. But it doesnโt mean that she thinks the nature of this work has ended.
โI would love if everyone in America felt like it was cool as shit to be a feminist โ thatโs what I want to happen. But even in times where itโs not sexy, we still have to organize,โ Morales Rocketto said.
Katherine Grainger, another Supermajority co-founder, also reflected on the โelectricity and excitementโ that surrounded Supermajorityโs founding during the first term of President Donald Trump, whose first election in 2016 sparked huge protests. It yielded, she said, millions of mobilized women.
Wait for it......at the exact perfect moment, the insurrection act 2.0 will be enacted. And down they will go. It always has to get worse before it gets better!
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF AMERICA:
FOR ALL FEDERAL AND STATE OATH TAKERS AND OATH BREAKERS...
FEDERAL ON BREAKING AN OATH OF OFFICE..
IMMEDIATE REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
IMMEDIATE SUSPRNSION OF SECURITY CLEARANCE(S)
IMMEDIATE CEASE OF PAY
IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF ALL CREDENTIALS, AUTHORITY, RANK, PRIVLEDGES
CRIMINAL RESTRAINT
RENUMERARTION TO HARMED PARTIES INCLUDING WE THE PEOPLE...
PER:
Specific statutes like 18 U.S.C. ยง 1918 outline penalties for violations, while actions like advocating the overthrow of the government are criminal offenses under 5 U.S.C. ยง 7311.
Applicable Federal Laws
5 U.S.C. ยง 7311: This statute makes it a criminal offense for federal employees, including members of Congress, to advocate for the overthrow or alteration of the U.S. government by unconstitutional means.
18 U.S.C. ยง 1918: This law provides the federal penalties for violating the oath of office, including removal from office, confinement, or fines.
Consequences for Federal Officials
Impeachment (for the President): The President, or other civil officers, can be impeached by the House of Representatives for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, which include violations of their oath.
Removal from Office: A conviction following an impeachment trial in the Senate can result in the removal of the official from their position.
Criminal Charges: In addition to impeachment, officials who violate their oath may face criminal prosecution for acts such as bribery, fraud, or abuse of power.
Fines and Imprisonment: Violations of certain statutes, such as the one prohibiting advocating for the overthrow of the government, can lead to confinement or fines under 18 U.S.C. ยง 1918.
Examples of Violations
A breach of the presidential oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" is a serious offense.
Inciting a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol, as alleged against former President Trump, was argued to be a direct violation of his duty to defend the Constitution, leading to impeachment proceedings.
Alien and Sedition Acts (1798). Also moves said violations and criminal charges/sentencing into the military courts purview.
Four funders supporting the right to protest in Minnesota: Proteus Fund ยท Solidaire Network ยท Tides Foundation ยท Open Society Foundations.National Bail Funds & Networks
The Bail Project: Provides free bail assistance nationwide.
National Bail Out: Focuses on freeing Black mothers and caregivers during key moments.
National Bail Fund Network (NBFN) (via Community Justice Exchange): A directory of over 80 local funds for pretrial detention and immigration cases, notes Community Justice Exchange and InfluenceWatch.
LGBTQ Freedom Fund: Assists LGBTQ individuals in detention.
Examples of Local & State Funds (from NBFN directory)
California: Bay Area Anti-Repression Committee Bail Fund.
Illinois: Chicago Community Bond Fund.
Kentucky: Louisville Community Bail Fund.
Michigan: Michigan Solidarity Bail Fund.
Minnesota: Minnesota Freedom Fund.
New York: Brooklyn Community Bail Fund, Envision Freedom Fund.Based on job data, potential salaries or hourly wages for related work in Missouri include:
Product Demonstrators earn an average of $14.50 to $17.05 per hour, depending on the city.
Petition Circulators have reported earnings of $75 - $100 an hour or can make a daily rate of $150-$450.
Political Canvassers and Field Organizers average around $18 - $22 per hour.
Full-time "Protest" jobs listed on job boards (often related to event promotion or advocacy) have a reported salary range between $30,000 and $79,000 annually, with specific roles like Political Associate at $55,000 - $68,000 a year.
A Civil Rights Activist position can range from $67,500 to $98,500 annually.
Overall wages for jobs categorized as "Protest Jobs" in Missouri have a median hourly wage of approximately $17.75 per hour.
Indirect support via groups like Future Forward USA (which backed Democrats) estimated at $50-100 million per cycle.153243a1350d
Bill Gates/Gates Foundation: The foundation has given small amounts to Democratic state parties (e.g., $15,412 to Wisconsin Democrats), but aggregates show about $42,611 to 39 House Democrats and $35,872 to 16 Senate Democrats total in recent cyclesโno individual names specified. Gates personally donated $50 million to Future Forward (supporting Kamala Harris and Democrats) in 2024. Direct to congressional members: Minimal, under $100k combined.cc292ae6802b
Clinton Foundation: Limited political giving; totals around $25,000 in 2024 cycle, mostly to DNC or candidates like Kamala Harrisโnot to House/Senate members directly. No specific congressional recipients found.
Rothschild Family: Minimal involvement; only one direct donation identified: Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) received $5,800 in 2022 from individuals affiliated with Rothschild North America.b376b6
Donations from Corporations, Tech Oligarchs (e.g., Google, Facebook/Meta, Amazon Executives), and Shell Companies
Tech industry contributions (from companies, PACs, and employees) heavily favor Democrats. These are often from executives or employee bundles. Here's a list of top Democratic recipients in the 2024 cycle from the "Internet" industry (including Google, Meta, Amazon):
House Democrats:
Ro Khanna (D-CA): $331,023
Colin Allred (D-TX): $299,004
Elissa Slotkin (D-MI): $290,416
Ruben Gallego (D-AZ): $259,766
Andy Kim (D-NJ): $163,614
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA): $123,725
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA): $122,455
Josh Harder (D-CA): $119,327
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): $117,207
Katie Porter (D-CA): $116,88578f0f6
Senate Democrats:
Jon Tester (D-MT): $425,561
Sherrod Brown (D-OH): $328,539
Bob Casey (D-PA): $271,887
Jacky Rosen (D-NV): $267,114
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI): $215,834
Maria Cantwell (D-WA): $180,352
Tim Kaine (D-VA): $117,411
Martin Heinrich (D-NM): $105,061
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY): $74,425
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN): $51,366fd4bbd
For shell companies/dark money: These are undisclosed by definition, but groups like Sixteen Thirty Fund and Arabella Advisors (linked to Wyss/Soros) have pumped $1.9 billion into 2024 races, often supporting Democrats via super PACs. Specific shell entities aren't named in records, but examples include funds routing foreign-linked money (e.g., criticized in congressional reports). No direct ties to individual members, but indirect support to competitive Democratic races estimated at hundreds of millions.3b756b60cff3
All estimates are from public FEC/OpenSecrets data and represent "real money" (reported contributions). Indirect/dark money makes full tracking challenging.
Donations from ActBlue
ActBlue is a nonprofit fundraising platform that processes small-dollar donations primarily for Democratic candidates and causes. Virtually all Democratic House and Senate members receive funds through ActBlue, as it's the main conduit for grassroots contributions to Democrats. These are not direct donations from ActBlue itself but aggregated from individual donors. Based on fundraising data, here are some of the top Democratic congressional fundraisers via ActBlue in recent cycles (e.g., 2024), with estimated totals raised through the platform:
Adam Schiff (D-CA, House/Senate candidate): Over $100 million in total fundraising, much via ActBlue.
Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY, House): Around $20-30 million.
Jon Tester (D-MT, Senate): Approximately $50-60 million.
Sherrod Brown (D-OH, Senate): Around $40-50 million.
Ruben Gallego (D-AZ, House/Senate candidate): About $30-40 million.
These estimates are based on overall campaign hauls where ActBlue handles the majority of online donations. ActBlue doesn't "donate" directly; it facilitates.
Donations from Foundations and NGOs (Soros, Wyss, Gates, Clinton, Rothschild)
Public records from sources like OpenSecrets show that these entities often contribute to PACs, party committees, or advocacy groups rather than directly to individual candidates. Direct donations to House/Senate members are limited by federal laws (e.g., $3,300 per individual per election). Here's what reliable data indicates:
George Soros/Open Society Foundations: Soros has contributed over $170 million to Democratic causes in recent cycles, mostly through PACs like Democracy PAC, which support Democratic candidates indirectly. No direct individual House/Senate recipient lists were found in aggregates, but he backed groups aiding Democrats like Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) via super PACs. Estimated indirect support to Democratic congressional races: Tens of millions per cycle.051c68
Hansjรถrg Wyss/Berger Action Fund: Wyss, through the Berger Action Fund and affiliates like Sixteen Thirty Fund, has funneled over $63 million to liberal groups in recent years. These funds go to dark money networks supporting Democratic priorities, but no direct donations to specific House/Senate members were identified.
Pocahontas Warren has hidden her money out of yet another NGO. Compliments of the Autopen. This NGO is closingโฆnobody noticed a few more billion โdisappearedโ.This story was originally reported by Jennifer Gerson of The 19th. Meet Jennifer and read more of their reporting on gender, politics and policy.
Supermajority, the nonprofit organization focused on mobilizing women voters, is shutting down.
Founded in 2019 by Cecile Richards, the former president of Planned Parenthood; Ai-jen Poo, co-founder and executive director of the National Domestic Workers Alliance; and #BlackLivesMatter co-creator Alicia Garza, Supermajority became a key player in the womenโs resistance movement.
Since its founding, Supermajority has contacted more than 20 million women voters, organizing for candidates including Democratic Govs. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Katie Hobbs of Arizona and Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, as well as for then-Vice President Kamala Harrisโ unsuccessful presidential bid last year. The group plans to connect its volunteers with other organizations that do grassroots organizing work, starting with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). All 22 current Supermajority employees will be laid off; the organization will be winding down its work in the next several weeks.
Executive director Taylor Salditch said the shuttering of Supermajority reflects how politics and organizing have changed since 2019, becoming more community-focused, with people looking for ways to make a tangible impact beyond protesting. She also said that for many Americans, especially on the left, gender has faded as a focus.
โI think when you have an administration that is so openly violent toward women, it makes all the sense in the world that women are not claiming that identity and running at it when itโs dangerous to do that,โ Salditch said.
Jess Morales Rocketto, another one of Supermajorityโs co-founders, said the groupโs founding was prompted by young women seeking a home for their desire to meet others and take action. Helping them organize is the groupโs legacy, she said.
โThere are organizations that exist now that didnโt exist when we started and there are leaders that exist now that didnโt exist when we started, and we trained some of them. Thatโs the legacy that we leave behind, and certainly a legacy that Cecile stood for, which feels very present to me in this as well,โ Morales Rocketto said. โAs organizers like to say, you want to organize yourself out of a job. I donโt think that we solved every problem for women, but I think that we have left something that can continue to build and grow that work.โ
She also recognizes how much the current cultural climate has changed โ and the impact that culture has on politics. But it doesnโt mean that she thinks the nature of this work has ended.
โI would love if everyone in America felt like it was cool as shit to be a feminist โ thatโs what I want to happen. But even in times where itโs not sexy, we still have to organize,โ Morales Rocketto said.
Katherine Grainger, another Supermajority co-founder, also reflected on the โelectricity and excitementโ that surrounded Supermajorityโs founding during the first term of President Donald Trump, whose first election in 2016 sparked huge protests. It yielded, she said, millions of mobilized women.